| Jan 01 2004 12:55:04 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C3 @ 20040101_1553 UT
All images are 1024 x 1024 pixels.
(0,0) in upper left corner.
Date Time X Y
---- ---- --- ---
Jan.1 1553 273 748
1625 279 743
1653 284 738
--------------------
Mike Boschat
|
Jan 01 2004 13:36:28 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
Possible Kreutz comet in C3
(1024 x 1024, 0,0 in upper left corner)
20040101_1725 363,631
20040101_1653 357,639
20040101_1625 354,643
20040101_1553 352,648
--Tony Hoffman
|
Jan 01 2004 14:05:15 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
I withdraw my report of Jan 01 2004 13:36:28; it appears to
be noise.
--Tony |
Jan 01 2004 15:55:04 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Disregard my post of:
Jan 01 2004 12:55:04
Something there on 4th image
but not there after that.
MB |
Jan 05 2004 13:03:37 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C3 @ 20040105_1053 UT
All images are 1024 x 1024 pixels.
(0,0) in upper left corner.
Date Time X Y
---- ---- --- ---
Jan.5 1053 247 711
1125 263 698
1625 299 674
--------------------
Mike Boschat
|
Jan 05 2004 13:42:40 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
disregard MY POST OF:
Jan 05 2004 13:03:37
mb |
Jan 06 2004 10:06:45 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C3 @ 20040106_1053 UT
small,faint,fuzzy
All images are 1024 x 1024 pixels.
(0,0) in upper left corner.
Date Time X Y
---- ---- --- ---
Jan.6 1053 224 652
1153 225 650
1225 229 649
--------------------
Mike Boschat
|
Jan 06 2004 13:06:02 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Update on possible comet??? in C3 @ 20040106_1053 UT
small,faint,fuzzy
All images are 1024 x 1024 pixels.
(0,0) in upper left corner.
Date Time X Y
---- ---- --- ---
Jan.6 1053 224 652
1153 225 650
1225 229 649
1625 237 642
--------------------
Mike Boschat |
Jan 06 2004 13:49:34 |
mike bosch
xxx@xxx |
Disregard my 2 posts of:
Jan 06 2004 13:06:02
Jan 06 2004 10:06:45
MB |
Jan 07 2004 16:45:56 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
Possible Marsden comet in LASCO C2 images,
1024 x 1024 pixels, 0,0 in upper left
20040107_2108 224,461
20040107_2030 201,469
20040107_1954 177.474
20040107_1931 162,478
--Tony Hoffman
|
Jan 07 2004 17:53:39 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
I withdraw my report of Jan 07 2004 16:45:56; it seems to be noise.
--Tony |
Jan 08 2004 13:38:17 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C3 @ 20040108_0918 UT
All images are 1024 x 1024 pixels.
(0,0) in upper left corner.
Date Time X Y
---- ---- --- ---
Jan.8 0918 230 686
0942 231 685
1020 235 682
1042 238 679
--------------------
Mike Boschat
|
Jan 08 2004 20:19:14 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Disregard my post of:
Jan 08 2004 13:38:17
A 6h gap in the images and
even with new one's can't
see anything continuiong
MB |
Jan 09 2004 18:25:50 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
Possible Kreutz Comet in C3 images
Positions: (0,0) upper left, 1024x1024
Date Time (x, y)
2004/01/09 C3 22:18
2004/01/09 C3 21:42 187 866
2004/01/09 C3 21:18 185 869
Update to follow
John Sachs |
Jan 09 2004 18:48:26 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
Update
Going to Be Bright!
Kreutz Comet in C3 images
Positions: (0,0) upper left, 1024x1024
Date Time (x, y)
2004/01/09 C3 23:18 195 856
2004/01/09 C3 22:18 190 862
2004/01/09 C3 21:42 187 866
2004/01/09 C3 21:18 185 869
John Sachs |
Jan 09 2004 18:57:43 |
|
| |
Jan 09 2004 19:16:00 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
I can confirm John's C3 comet--
it should be a nice one.
--Tony |
Jan 10 2004 11:31:16 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C2 @ 20040110_1454 UT
All images are 1024 x 1024 pixels.
(0,0) in upper left corner.
Date Time X Y
---- ---- --- ---
Jan.10 1454 4 763
1506 8 749
--------------------
Mike Boschat
|
Jan 10 2004 11:37:28 |
mike bosc
xxx@xxx |
DISREGARD MY POST of:
Jan 10 2004 11:31:16
MB |
Jan 11 2004 13:40:45 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
John Sachs's comet entered C2
at 1034 January 11.
--Tony |
Jan 11 2004 15:40:32 |
conor Mc donald
xxx@xxx |
seen comet threw special paper when looking for sun spots today.
is quite bright about 2o clock(direction)
seen at 9;35 am on sunday 11
no other objects in sky round comet.
at full arms length is about 1 and a half cm from sun
no tail looks stable.
get back as soon as possible |
Jan 11 2004 21:25:12 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C3 @ 20040111_2042 UT
All images are 1024 x 1024 pixels.
(0,0) in upper left corner.
Date Time X Y
---- ---- --- ---
Jan.11 2042 290 815
2118 292 814
2142 295 810
--------------------
Mike Boschat
|
Jan 11 2004 23:51:41 |
Tony h
xxx@xxx |
Possible Kreutz comet in LASCO C3 images,
1024 x 1024 pixels, 0,0 in upper left
20040112_0342 136,917
20040112_0318 132,920
20040112_0242 127,925
20040112_0218 124,927
--Tony Hoffman
|
Jan 12 2004 00:06:32 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Disregard my post of:
Jan 11 2004 21:25:12
later images at 0200 UT can;t see
anything..
MB |
Jan 12 2004 00:42:30 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
I withdraw my claim of Jan 11 2004 23:51:41--
seems to be noise.
--Tony |
Jan 13 2004 04:23:36 |
Mike Boschat
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C3 @ 20040113_0642 UT
All images are 1024 x 1024 pixels.
(0,0) in upper left corner.
Date Time X Y
---- ---- --- ---
Jan.13 0642 141 909
0742 144 906
0818 146 902
--------------------
Mike Boschat
|
Jan 13 2004 10:04:17 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
I withdraw my post of:
Jan 13 2004 04:23:36
MB |
Jan 13 2004 20:15:03 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C3 @ 20040113_2318 UT
All images are 1024 x 1024 pixels.
(0,0) in upper left corner.
Date Time X Y
---- ---- --- ---
Jan.13 2318 246 797
2342 248 793
Jan.14 0018 249 790
--------------------
Mike Boschat
|
Jan 14 2004 10:35:25 |
mi bosc
xxx@xxx |
FORGET my post of:
Jan 13 2004 20:15:03
MB |
Jan 14 2004 17:49:30 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C3 @ 20040114_1942 UT
All images are 1024 x 1024 pixels.
(0,0) in upper left corner.
Date Time X Y
---- ---- --- ---
Jan.14 2018 285 742
2042 287 740
2118 289 738
-------------------
Mike Boschat
|
Jan 15 2004 11:18:34 |
Mr Sungrazer
xxx@xxx |
Hi all,
Confirmations and minor alterations:
Soho# Date/Time of Post Discoverer Tel Group
=========================================================
673 11/06/03 04:02:39 J. Danaher C3 Non-Group
674 10/12/03 00:51:02 X.-M. Zhou C2 Kreutz
675 8/24/03 23:13:49 M. Boschat C3 Kreutz
676 10/13/03 10:39:26 J. Sachs C3 Kreutz
677 10/15/03 10:44:27 M. Boschat C2 Kreutz
678 10/17/03 09:59:22 X. Leprette C2 Kreutz
679 10/20/03 13:17:00 J. Sachs C3 Kreutz
680 10/20/03 23:29:02 R. Matson C2 Meyer
681 10/22/03 22:36:55 X.-M. Zhou C2 Kreutz
682 10/25/03 17:21:47 X. Leprette C2 Kreutz
683 10/26/03 13:--:-- Boschat/Sachs/Danaher C2 Kreutz
684 11/01/03 17:11:42 R. Kracht C2 Kreutz
685 11/03/03 09:02:28 M.Boschat C3 Kreutz
686 11/04/03 20:46:47 M.Boschat C2 Kreutz
Note that I have gone ahead with my plan to shuffle the numbers
slightly. XingMing has been promoted to 674, while Jim has gone
down to 673. I don't intend to make a habit of shuffling the
numbers like that -- it just seemed reasonable here. Also note
Mike's comet which I'd previously skipped inadvertantly. It was
his other unretracted claim that I looked at and decided was an
X-comet (8/25/03 12:17:18).
Comet 683 gets joint credit. Both Mike's and John's initail
reports contained errors, but I'm reasonably confident they were
both looking at the comet itself. Jim was the first to follow the
guidlines and post four accurate positions. PLEASE NOTE: In
future I will not be as lenient! Inaccurate postings will lose
you any split decisions! Please take an extra 30 seconds to check
your post before hitting "submit". Posts that claim "I hit submit
by accident" will be treated with contempt and suspicion!
On a happier note, I'm less than a year behind on the measuring,
and I'm catching up nicely with the confirming too!
Email me with any questions/comments/complaints/compliments...
~~KB
|
Jan 15 2004 13:54:04 |
Mr Sungrazer
xxx@xxx |
Also...
Thanks to Jonathan Shanklin for reminding me -- I meant to comment
on the other unretracted claims for that period. Rob Matson's comet
(Oct 16th) is an X-comet. There's definitely a comet there in the
first two images, but after that it's just noise and guess-work. Jim
Danaher's report (Nov 03) of the fragment in the tail of Mike's (?)
comet, is a little too optimistic.
By the way, I hope you all enjoyed the irony of my 'accuracy of
postings' lecture containing two spelling mistakes...
~~KB |
Jan 15 2004 15:16:38 |
Mr Sungrazer
xxx@xxx |
683 10/26/03 13:--:-- Boschat/Sachs/Danaher C2 Kreutz
should read...
683 10/26/03 13:--:-- Boschat/Sachs/Danaher C3 Kreutz
|
Jan 15 2004 20:33:23 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
Possible Kreutz comet in LASCO C3 images,
1024 x 1024 pixels, 0,0 in upper left
20040116_0018 160,799
20040115_2342 154,803
20040115_2318 151,808
20040115_2218 144,816
--Tony Hoffman
|
Jan 15 2004 20:47:15 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
I withdraw my claim of Jan 15 2004 20:33:23;
nothing at 0042.
--Tony |
Jan 15 2004 21:13:22 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
Possible Kracht comet in LASCO C2 images,
1024 x 1024 pixels, 0,0 in upper left
20040116_0054 107,331
20040116_0030 76,332
20040116_0006 44,333
20040115_2354 29,334
Faint
--Tony Hoffman
|
Jan 15 2004 21:25:50 |
Gregg Gallina
xxx@xxx |
I can confirm Tony's Kracht comet...is faint but moves on
correct trajectory.
Also see it on 2330 image at 5,334
Well done Tony,
Respectfully,
Gregg |
Jan 16 2004 18:59:29 |
Mr Sungrazer
xxx@xxx |
Even more confirmations! 25 in 2 days -- don't expect this all
the time!
Soho# Date/Time of Post Discoverer Tel Group
=========================================================
687 11/05/03 11:21:47 M. Boschat C3 Kreutz
688 11/09/03 22:50:17 T. Hoffman C2 Kreutz
689 11/11/03 17:11:41 R. Matson C2 Kreutz
690 11/13/03 08:55:44 J. Sachs C3/C2 Kreutz
691 11/16/03 12:13:47 X.-M. Zhou C2 Kreutz
692 11/21/03 13:14:47 D. Evans C2 Kreutz
693 11/22/03 14:19:10 M. Boschat C3 Kreutz
694 11/25/03 15:17:03 J. Sachs C3/C2 Kreutz
695 11/27/03 05:07:02 X.-M. Zhou C2 Kreutz
696 11/29/03 05:38:42 X.-M. Zhou C2 Meyer
697 11/29/03 08:16:06 G. Gallina C2 Kreutz
I'm sure there's a typo in there somewhere, but nothing major I
hope.
Has anyone looked to see if XingMing's Meyer is visible in C3? It
looked pretty bright entering and leaving C2. If so, post to
yahoo, otherwise I intend to check it out on Tuesday.
Tantalisingly close to 700...
~~KB
|
Jan 18 2004 12:52:16 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
Black and white not rotated
Possible Kreutz Comet in C3 images
Positions: (0,0) upper left, 1024x1024
Date Time (x, y)
2004/01/18 C3 09:42 901 701
2004/01/18 C3 09:18 897 705
2004/01/18 C3 08:42 893 711
2004/01/18 C3 08:18
John Sachs |
Jan 18 2004 13:07:55 |
Sebastian Hönig
xxx@xxx |
Sungrazer in LASCO C3 today
512 x 512 (0,0) upper left
Time (x,y);
11:42 158,341
12:18 160,338
12:42 162,336
Sebastian |
Jan 18 2004 13:08:01 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
Update on comet reported Jan 18 2004 12:52:16
Converted from B&W
Kreutz Comet in C3 images
Positions: (0,0) upper left, 1024x1024
Date Time (x, y)
2004/01/18 C3 12:42 320 573
2004/01/18 C3 12:18 316 578
2004/01/18 C3 11:42 312 584
2004/01/18 C3 10:44 309 587
John Sachs |
Jan 18 2004 13:10:45 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
Possible Kreutz comet in LASCO C3 images, b/w
512 x 512 pixels, 0,0 in upper left
20040118_1044 357,216
20040118_1118 356,219
20040118_1142 354,221
More positions to follow.
--Tony
|
Jan 18 2004 13:33:42 |
Sebastian Hönig
xxx@xxx |
Sungrazer in LASCO C3 today (update of Jan 18 2004 13:07:55)
512 x 512 (0,0) upper left
Time (x,y);
11:42 158,341
12:18 160,338
12:42 162,336
14:42 171,327
15:18 174,323
15:42 176,321
BTW: Couldn't match this one from John's initial report:
Transformation to his initial b/w: 2*(512-x, 512-y) -> (1024 x 1024) derotated
(0,0) upper left: 11:42 708,342
Am I something missing? Thankful for help via private emails.
Sebastian
|
Jan 18 2004 13:38:44 |
XingMing Zhou
xxx@xxx |
Another a possible NOn-comet in C2(B/W) now.
Visible 1406-16:54
512X512 0,0 in upper left.
2004-01-18
....
16:06 23,411
16:30 8,410
XingMing Zhou |
Jan 18 2004 13:48:15 |
XingMing Zhou
xxx@xxx |
Update
Another a possible NOn-comet in C2(B/W) now.Minor?
Visible 1406-16:54
512X512 0,0 in upper left.
2004-01-18
....
14:54 68,363
15:06 60,362
15:30 45,362
15:54 30,362
16:06 23,361
16:30 8,360
XingMing Zhou |
Jan 18 2004 13:57:21 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
I can confirm XingMing's non-Kreutz claim; nice find. Might be a Kracht comet, or related to C/2002 R5.
--Tony |
Jan 18 2004 13:58:15 |
Maik Meyer
xxx@xxx |
XingMings object may be (21) Lutetia, which should have 11.5 mag..
this seems quite faint... How faint goes C2?
Maik |
Jan 18 2004 16:05:19 |
Rainer Kracht
xxx@xxx |
Another probably Kracht-group related comet?
images 1024*1024 pixel, (0,0) in upper left corner
Date Time x y
20040118 0354 22,313
20040118 0406 35,212
20040118 0430 65,309
20040118 0530 139,304
20040118 0554 170,302
20040118 0606 185,301
20040118 0630 216,299
and probably more
Could be XingMing's non-Kreutz entering C2
Rainer |
Jan 19 2004 12:23:35 |
Sebastian Hönig
xxx@xxx |
Sungrazer in LASCO C3 today
0,0 upper left, 512 x 512
Time (x,y)
13:42 145,334
14:18 148,331
14:42 150,329
15:18
Sebastian |
Jan 19 2004 12:27:18 |
Sebastian Hönig
xxx@xxx |
Sungrazer in LASCO C3 today (update)
0,0 upper left, 512 x 512
Time (x,y)
13:42 145,334
14:18 148,331
14:42 150,329
15:18 152,328
15:42 153,326
16:18 156,323
Sebastian |
Jan 19 2004 12:32:19 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
I can confirm Sebastian's C3 sungrazer.
--tony |
Jan 19 2004 12:34:05 |
Xavier Leprette
xxx@xxx |
Possible Kreutz comet in C3 of 2004/01/19
0,0 in top-left corner of 512x512 B&W frames (rotated of 180°)
col, row
15:18 152,329
15:42 153,327
16:18 156,325
16:42
Xavier Leprette |
Jan 19 2004 12:37:35 |
Xavier Leprette
xxx@xxx |
Possible Kreutz comet in C3 of 2004/01/19
UPDATE :
0,0 in top-left corner of 512x512 B&W frames (rotated of 180°)
col, row
15:18 152,329
15:42 153,327
16:18 156,325
16:42 158,322
17:18 161,319
Xavier Leprette
|
Jan 19 2004 14:19:54 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
I can CONFIRM Xavier's C3 find of
today Jan 19 2004 12:34:05
Mike B. |
Jan 19 2004 14:24:07 |
Maik Meyer
xxx@xxx |
Xavier's comet is the same as Sebastian's reported 11 minutes
earlier. Maik
|
Jan 19 2004 22:19:11 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C3 @ 20040119_2342 UT
All images are 1024 x 1024 pixels.
(0,0) in upper left corner.
Date Time X Y
---- ---- --- ---
Jan.19 2342 229 643
Jan.20 0018 234 641
0042 241 637
0142 249 633
-------------------
Mike Boschat
|
Jan 20 2004 12:46:38 |
Mr Sungrazer
xxx@xxx |
For the sake of completeness...
Soho# Date/Time of Post Discoverer Tel Group
=========================================================
698 11/30/03 23:22:13 T. Hoffman C2 Kreutz
699 12/01/03 10:28:44 M. Boschat C2 Kreutz
700 12/02/03 00:15:27 X.-M. Zhou C2 Kreutz
....CONGRATULATIONS XINGMING!! .... SOHO700!! ....
Well done to you all! It's a great achievement to reach 700 --
keep up the good work, and let's hope for 700 more!!
~~KB
|
Jan 20 2004 14:49:39 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
Possible Kreutz Comet in C3 images
Positions: (0,0) upper left, 1024x1024
Date Time (x y)
2004/01/20 C3 19:42 319 637
2004/01/20 C3 18:42 314 643
2004/01/20 C3 18:18 311 646
Update to follow
John Sachs |
Jan 20 2004 14:54:45 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
Disregard my post Jan 20 2004 14:49:39
Noise
John |
Jan 21 2004 01:09:39 |
Danaher James
xxx@xxx |
Comet in C3 at:
2004/01/21 05:42 X=307 Y=672
2004/01/21 05:18 X=303 Y=677
2004/01/21 04:42 X=299 Y=682
1024x1024 images (enlarged from 512x512 & vertical flipped). Upper left (0,0).
More to follow...
Jim Danaher, xxx@xxx |
Jan 21 2004 01:42:51 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
I can confirm Jim's C3 claim--
Congratulations on comet #10.
--Tony |
Jan 21 2004 08:22:30 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C3 @ 20040121_1020 UT
All images are 1024 x 1024 pixels.
(0,0) in upper left corner.
Date Time X Y
---- ---- --- ---
Jan.21 1020 264 736
1042 269 734
1118 272 729
1142 275 725
--------------------
Mike Boschat
|
Jan 21 2004 08:35:01 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
UPDATE on new Kruetz comet in C3 @ 20040121_1020 UT
Unrotated = 'wrong' way up (occulter arm in top right)
Jim's comet is the bright one in C3 which is nearing
the occultating disk.
This new comet is far behind his, and I have traced
it back to 0842 UT.
I hope the above Unrotated will not mess up my XY's.
All images are 1024 x 1024 pixels.
(0,0) in upper left corner.
Date Time X Y
---- ---- --- ---
jan.21 0842 254 751
0918 258 747
0942 262 743
1020 264 736
1042 269 734
1118 272 729
1142 275 725
--------------------
Mike Boschat
|
Jan 21 2004 09:04:03 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
I can confirm Mike Boschat's C3 Kreutz claim.
--Tony |
Jan 21 2004 13:58:21 |
Danaher James
xxx@xxx |
There is another possible comet in C3, very dim at:
2004/01/21 12:42 X,Y=390,624
2004/01/21 12:18 X,Y=387,627
2004/01/21 11:42 X,Y=384,634
2004/01/21 11:18 X,Y=379,638
1024x1024. Upper left (0,0).
Regarding my posting of Jan 21 2004 01:09:39
That should have read:
(enlarged from 512x512 & 180 deg rotated)
The 1024x1024 measurements of the Jan 21 2004 01:09:39
comet in C3 are:
2004/01/21 10:42 X,Y=350,629
many images...
2004/01/21 06:18 X,Y=312,667
2004/01/21 05:42 X=307 Y=672
2004/01/21 05:18 X=303 Y=676
2004/01/21 04:42 X=299 Y=680
Jim Danaher, xxx@xxx |
Jan 21 2004 14:43:00 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
Jim, on your post of Jan 21 2004 13:58:21
is this not the same comet you reported
Jan 21 2004 01:09:39??
John |
Jan 21 2004 14:56:55 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
Sorry my numbers were off,
Jim is looking at something new.
I was looking at your earlier comet.
Disregard my question.
John |
Jan 21 2004 21:39:49 |
Martin Mc Kenna
xxx@xxx |
I wish to report a possible comet in C3 images??..
DATE TIME POSITION
2004/01/21 22.18 11 o clock - upper left
2004/01/21 23.18 10.30 position upper left
2004/01/21 23.42 7 o clock - mid left
Could not confirm possible comet in a 4th image.
Comet had a bright well condened coma and a long faint thin tail.
I am a first timer and so have not got to gribs with the co-ordinate system used yet. |
Jan 21 2004 21:43:49 |
Martin Mc Kenna
xxx@xxx |
Forgot to mention image size as 256x256 real time. |
Jan 22 2004 10:58:03 |
Scarmato Toni
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C3
positions 1024x1024 0,0 top-left
20040122
1242 34,795
1342 44,789
1418 48,786
I am waiting other images to confirm.
Regards,
Toni Scarmato |
Jan 22 2004 11:06:56 |
Scarmato Toni
xxx@xxx |
The object seem visible also at
20040122 1218 32,797 1024x1024 0,0 top-left
Toni |
Jan 22 2004 11:55:12 |
Scarmato Toni
xxx@xxx |
Regarding my report in C3, I am not able to follow
the object on images after 1418, probably is a combination
of noise.
If it is real probably will be visible on the next
images.
Regards,
Toni |
Jan 23 2004 13:57:14 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C3 @ 20040123_1618 UT
Unrotated image
All images are 1024 x 1024 pixels.
(0,0) in upper left corner.
Date Time X Y
---- ---- --- ---
Jan.23 1618 238 740
1642 246 737
1718 251 735
--------------------
Mike Boschat
|
Jan 23 2004 14:10:55 |
Mr Sungrazer
xxx@xxx |
More confirmations:
Soho# Date/Time of Post Discoverer Tel Group
=========================================================
701 12/04/03 12:06:34 R. Kracht C2 Kreutz
702 12/04/03 20:31:36 M. Boschat C2 Kreutz
703 12/07/03 11:47:38 X.-M. Zhou C2 Kreutz
704 12/07/03 17:31:50 M. Boschat C2 Kreutz
705 12/08/03 01:50:21 T. Hoffman C2 Kreutz
706 12/09/03 10:41:38 X.-M. Zhou C2 Kreutz
707 12/11/03 12:23:32 X. Leprette C2 Kreutz
708 12/13/03 10:15:31 X.-M. Zhou C2 Kreutz
709 12/19/03 11:42:30 X. Leprette C2 Kreutz
710 12/19/03 21:38:13 R. Matson C2 Kreutz
711 12/20/03 06:24:52 M. Meyer C2 Meyer
712 12/20/03 13:35:58 R. Kracht C2 Kreutz
Rob Matson made a claim 12/05/03 20:30:47. I'm pretty sure
there's a comet there. Unfortunately there aren't many 'useful'
images around that time and I couldn't get consecutive positions
without resorting to guesswork. So it's an X-comet.
I looked for Maik's Meyer comet in C3 but couldn't find it, and
the same goes for Rainer's Kreutz (712) -- that one I suspect is
hidden by the occulter arm.
I'll finish off the December confirmations next week -- I'll have
processed the level_05 data for that period by then.
Martin: What you reported was almost certainly stars and/or
cosmic rays. New comet hunters are more than welcome here, but
please take time to look around at the site, particularly the
"Found Something?" page and some of the links on the "Other
Links" page. The java tool on
http://lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil/javagif/ is ideal for measuring
xy's.
Email with any questions, etc...
~~KB
|
Jan 23 2004 17:11:27 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Disregard my post of:
Jan 23 2004 13:57:14
I'm not sure about the object
and the 2 hour gap should have
showed it.
Mike B |
Jan 24 2004 02:32:49 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
Possible Kreutz comet in LASCO C3 images,
1024 x 1024 pixels, 0,0 in upper left
“as is” (occulter at upper right)
20040122_0442
20040124_0542 158,736
20040124_0518 154,739
20040124_0418 144,743
--Tony Hoffman
|
Jan 24 2004 02:41:35 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
I withdraw my claim of Jan 24 2004 02:32:49;
it seems to be noise.
--Tony |
Jan 24 2004 09:14:59 |
Scarmato Toni
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in c3
positions 1024x1024 0,0 top-left
20040124
1044 149,795
1118 152,792
1142 155,791
1218 158,788
Regards,
Toni Scarmato |
Jan 24 2004 09:36:12 |
Scarmato Toni
xxx@xxx |
Nothing at 1242 in c3,
not consider my last report.
Regards,
Toni Scarmato |
Jan 24 2004 21:01:59 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
Possible Kreutz comet in LASCO C3 images,
1024 x 1024 pixels, 0,0 in upper left
“as is” (occulter at upper right)
20040125_0018 299,673
20040124_2342 294,678
20040124_2318 290,682
--Tony Hoffman
|
Jan 24 2004 21:10:40 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
Possible Kreutz Comet in C3 images
Positions: (0,0) upper left, 1024x1024
Date Time (x, y)
2004/01/25 C3 00:18 110 222
2004/01/24 C3 23:42 98 212
Update to follow
John Sachs |
Jan 24 2004 21:11:46 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
Update: Possible Kreutz comet in LASCO C3 images,
1024 x 1024 pixels, 0,0 in upper left
“as is” (occulter at upper right)
20040125_0042 302,670
20040125_0018 299,673
20040124_2342 294,678
20040124_2318 290,682
Stellar looking.
--Tony Hoffman
|
Jan 24 2004 21:18:03 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx` |
CONFIRMING --- Tony Hoffman comet
report of Jan 24 2004 21:01:59
Mike Boschat |
Jan 24 2004 21:27:35 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
Congrats Tony!
Disregard my post below of Jan 24 2004 21:10:40
I had wrong cooridinates.
John |
Jan 25 2004 16:31:13 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Proable comet in C3 @ 20040125_1742 UT
"uncorrected" - pylon in upper right
All images are 1024 x 1024 pixels.
(0,0) in upper left corner.
Date Time X Y
---- ---- --- ---
Jan.25 1742 233 714
1818 238 711
1842 242 708
1942 247 703
--------------------
Mike Boschat
|
Jan 25 2004 16:58:33 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
UPDATE on comet in C3 @ 20040125_1742 UT
"uncorrected" - pylon in upper right
All images are 1024 x 1024 pixels.
(0,0) in upper left corner.
Date Time X Y
---- ---- --- ---
Jan.25 1742 233 714
1818 238 711
1842 242 708
1942 247 703
2018 255 695 -- brightens more strating here.
2042 258 693
--------------------
Mike Boschat
|
Jan 25 2004 20:44:35 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
I can confirm Mike Boschats
post of Jan 25 2004 16:58:33.
Congrats Mike
John |
Jan 26 2004 23:20:59 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
Possible Kreutz comet entering LASCO C3 images
1024 x 1024 pixels, 0,0 in upper left
“as is” (occulter at upper right)
20040127_0242 67,779
20040127_0218 62,783
20040125_0142 56,789
20040125_0042 44,799
--Tony Hoffman
|
Jan 26 2004 23:43:18 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
I withdraw my claim of Jan 26 2004 23:20:59;
it seems it was noise.
--Tony |
Jan 27 2004 06:54:05 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Proable comet in C3 @ 20040127_0942 UT
"uncorrected" = pylon in upper right
All images are 1024 x 1024 pixels.
(0,0) in upper left corner.
Date Time X Y
---- ---- --- ---
Jan.27 0942 280 793
1020 282 789
1042 284 784
--------------------
Mike Boschat
|
Jan 27 2004 08:39:37 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Disregard my post of:
Jan 27 2004 06:54:05
Mike B. |
Jan 27 2004 15:09:24 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
Possible Kreutz Comet in C3 images
Positions: (0,0) upper left, 1024x1024
Date Time (x, y
2004/01/26 C3 19:42 317 653
2004/01/26 C3 18:42 307 661
2004/01/26 C3 18:18 303 665
Update to follow
John Sachs |
Jan 27 2004 15:35:43 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
My post of Jan 27 2004 15:09:24
dates should have read 2004/01/26
John |
Jan 27 2004 15:36:42 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
My post of Jan 27 2004 15:09:24
dates should have read 2004/01/27
But looks like it may be noise.
Sorry
John |
Jan 29 2004 10:06:45 |
Xavier Leprette
xxx@xxx |
Possible Kreutz comet in C3 of 2004/01/29
0,0 in top-left corner of 512x512 B&W frames (rotated of 180°)
col, row
03:42 165,308
04:18 166,307
04:42 168,305
05:18 172,303
Xavier Leprette |
Jan 29 2004 11:50:06 |
Scarmato Toni
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C3
positions 512x512 0,0 top-left
20040129
0942 158,356
1020 160,353
1042 161,351
1118 163,348
Regards,
Toni Scarmato |
Jan 29 2004 12:07:28 |
Xavier Leprette
xxx@xxx |
Disregard my previous report about a possible C3 comet.
It's not a real object on the 1024 color images.
Xavier Leprette |
Jan 29 2004 12:12:45 |
Scarmato Toni
xxx@xxx |
REgarding my last report in C3 on 1024 images at
1118 the object appear to be a faint star that in 512
images is not visible.
Regards,
Toni Scarmato |
Jan 29 2004 15:39:06 |
Mr Sungrazer
xxx@xxx |
Final confirmations of 2003:
Soho# Date/Time of Post Discoverer Tel Group
=========================================================
713 12/22/03 16:26:39 M. Boschat C2 Kreutz
714 12/23/03 11:55:47 J. Sachs C3/C2 Kreutz
715 12/24/03 14:10:45 R. Kracht C3/C2 Kreutz
716 12/25/03 19:41:49 M. Boschat C2 Kreutz
717 12/26/03 05:04:16 M. Oates C2 Kreutz
718 12/26/03 15:32:38 R. Matson C2 Kreutz
719 12/26/03 19:50:30 R. Matson C2 Kreutz
720 12/27/03 03:48:49 R. Matson C2 Kreutz
721 12/27/03 05:03:45 X.-M. Zhou C3/C2 Kreutz
722 12/17/03 06:01:33 R. Matson C2 Kreutz
723 12/31/03 17:14:32 R. Matson C2 Kreutz
Regarding the uncertainty surrounding XingMing's comet, there was
indeed only one comet. John's tentative claim was that comet as
it reappeared from behind the occulter arm.
Thanks to John and Mike for pointing me to Rob's Kreutz. I should
have brought my brain cell with me today -- Rob's xy's were
perfectly accurate!
I must be within 10 comets of you guys now... yay!
As usual, feel free to email me with questions, etc.
~~KB
|
Jan 29 2004 20:56:13 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Proable comet in C3 @ 20040129_2318 UT
All images are 1024 x 1024 pixels.
(0,0) in upper left corner.
Date Time X Y
---- ---- --- ---
jan.29 2318 187 778
2342 191 776
Jan.30 0018 193 774
--------------------
Mike Boschat
|
Jan 30 2004 03:07:08 |
Sebastian Hönig
xxx@xxx |
New faint sungrazer in LASCO C3 today
0,0 upper left, 1024 x 1024
Time (x,y)
04:18 276,669
04:42 280,665
05:18 286,662
05:42 290,657
06:18 295,653
06:42 300,649
Note: I traced it back to Mike B's position but wasn't able to
match both so it seems to be not related.
Sebastian |
Jan 30 2004 04:11:11 |
Gregg Gallina
xxx@xxx |
I can confirm Sebastian's C3 Kruetz...Nice work!
The comet's origin would have been to the right of Mike's claim.
Respectfully,
Gregg Gallina |
Jan 30 2004 04:52:46 |
Sebastian Hönig
xxx@xxx |
Update on new faint sungrazer in LASCO C3 today
- Complete set of positions up to 09:42 UT -
0,0 upper left, 1024 x 1024
Time (x,y)
03:18 267,676
03:42 271,672
04:18 276,669
04:42 280,665
05:18 286,662
05:42 290,657
06:18 295,653
06:42 300,649
07:42 308,642
08:18 315,637
08:42 320,632
09:18 326,627
09:42 330,624
Additionally to Gregg's remark: I cannot confirm Mike B's
object.
Sebastian
|
Jan 30 2004 10:15:21 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Disregard my post of:
Jan 29 2004 20:56:13
After consulting with 2
other observers we have decided
it was "noise".
Mike B. |
Jan 30 2004 23:25:20 |
James Danaher
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C3 at:
2004/01/31 01:42 X,Y=281,689
2004/01/31 02:18 X,Y=287,684
2004/01/31 02:42 X,Y=291,680
1024x1024 images, Upper left (0,0).
Last is 512x512 image
enlarged 2:1 and rotated 180 deg.
Jim Danaher, xxx@xxx |
Jan 31 2004 02:12:47 |
James Danaher
xxx@xxx |
I withdraw my claim of Jan 30 2004 23:25:20
Jim Danaher
xxx@xxx |