Sep 01 2003 00:09:30 |
Heiner Otterstedt
xxx@xxx |
Possible non Kreutz comet in LASCO C3 images
Date: Sunday, August 31, 2003
Positions: 1024x1024 images, (0,0) upper left
yyyy.mm.dd hh:mm x y
---------- ----- ---- ----
2003.08.31 20:42 80 577
2003.08.31 21:18 82 576
2003.08.31 21:42 83 574
2003.08.31 22:18 85 573
Regards,
Heiner Otterstedt
|
Sep 01 2003 00:22:50 |
Bo Zhou
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C2 at 2003/09/01 UT
512x512 gifs,
0,0 in upper left corner
Time X , Y
__:__ __,___
0242 101,117
0318 103,120
0342 104,121
0418 105,122
0442
------------
Bo Zhou |
Sep 01 2003 01:09:31 |
Bo Zhou
xxx@xxx |
Sorry everyone,
I disregard my post of Sep 01 2003 00:22:50
----------------
Bo Zhou |
Sep 01 2003 07:49:03 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Disregard my post of
Aug 31 2003 07:30:42
MB |
Sep 02 2003 21:54:12 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Possible Kreutz comet in C3 @ 20030902_2218 UT
****** NOTE ******
x-coordinates are probably correct,
but y-coordinates may be off by
7 pixels. 777,460 in lower right corner
Corrections made for my 0,0
LASCO C3 IMAGES - 1024 x 1024
Date Time X Y
-------- ---- --- ---
20030902 2218 823 703
2318 817 700
2342 812 698
20030903 0018 803 695
0042 798 693
--------------
Michael Boschat
|
Sep 03 2003 11:07:01 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
UPDATE on possible comet in C3 @ 20030902_2218 UT
Faint and loose it about 0418 UT image.
****** NOTE ******
x-coordinates are probably correct,
but y-coordinates may be off by
7 pixels. 777,460 in lower right corner
Corrections made for my 0,0
LASCO C3 IMAGES - 1024 x 1024
Date Time X Y
-------- ---- --- ---
20030902 2218 823 703
2318 817 700
2342 812 698
20030903 0018 803 695
0042 798 693
0142 790 689
0218 785 687
0242 781 686
0318 777 684
0342 772 679
--------------
Michael Boschat |
Sep 04 2003 02:39:20 |
Paul Almy
xxx@xxx |
This is more of a question. Aug 30 2003 was a very clear night in Normandy France and I was looking at the sky especially Mars, with simple binoculars when I saw what appeared to be a comet. I don't know how to situate it exactly but it was in the middle of the Eastern sky a little North at the apex of a serries of stars that formed an acute angle pointing upward and to the NE. Now that I have everyone laughing, does this correspond to any recent sightings? Just curious. (It was just barely visible with the naked eye once I had spotted it with the binoculars). |
Sep 04 2003 06:35:04 |
|
|
Sep 04 2003 13:37:14 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
Possible Kreutz comet
Positions: (0,0) upper left, 1024x1024
Date Time (x, y)
2003/09/04 C3 16:42
2003/09/04 C3 16:18 762 722
2003/09/04 C3 12:42 770 732
2003/09/04 C3 12:18 775 736
John |
Sep 04 2003 13:42:34 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
Please ignore my post
of Sep 04 2003 13:37:14
below. Mistake
John |
Sep 05 2003 07:37:51 |
XingMing Zhou
xxx@xxx |
Possible Kreutz comet in real-time C3 images now.
faint.
1024x1024 images, (0,0) down right corner.
Date Time (x,y)
2003/09/05 09:18 301,364
09:42 304,367
10:20 313,373
10:42 317,376
Regards,
XingMing Zhou |
Sep 05 2003 08:34:43 |
XingMing Zhou
xxx@xxx |
Update
Possible Kreutz comet in real-time C3 images now.
It's faint,but clear in six images now.
1024x1024 images, (0,0) in lower right corner.
Date Time (x,y)
2003/09/05 09:18 301,364
09:42 304,367
10:20 313,373
10:42 317,376
11:18 325,381
11:42 329,384
Regards,
XingMing Zhou
|
Sep 05 2003 08:37:34 |
Kazimieras Cernis
xxx@xxx |
I can confirm the comet in C3 discovered by XingMing.
Kazimieras Cernis |
Sep 05 2003 10:12:57 |
Heiner Otterstedt
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in LASCO C3 images
Date: Friday, September 05, 2003
Positions: 1024x1024 images, (0,0) upper left
yyyy.mm.dd hh:mm x y
---------- ----- ---- ----
2003.09.05 10:20 710 651
2003.09.05 10:42 706 648
2003.09.05 11:18 698 643
2003.09.05 11:42 694 640
Regards,
Heiner Otterstedt
|
Sep 05 2003 10:18:49 |
Heiner Otterstedt
xxx@xxx |
Oh, sorry I just see that I allways get 1024
if I add your Coordinates to mine :-)
Confirmation of XingMing's Object!
Regards,
Heiner Otterstedt
|
Sep 07 2003 23:18:44 |
Monte Collard
xxx@xxx |
C3 Image Size = 1024x1024
Point X Y YYYYMMDD HHMM Julmins Height(km)
0 43 206 20030907 1023 4565423 2.339E7
1 45 208 20030907 1044 4565444 2.327E7
2 47 207 20030907 1118 4565478 2.323E7
3 49 207 20030907 1142 4565502 2.316E7
4 53 207 20030907 1218 4565538 2.303E7
5 56 207 20030907 1242 4565562 2.293E7
6 61 209 20030907 1342 4565622 2.272E7
7 65 209 20030907 1418 4565658 2.258E7
8 66 210 20030907 1442 4565682 2.253E7
9 80 210 20030907 1718 4565838 2.207E7
10 82 210 20030907 1742 4565862 2.200E7
11 86 211 20030907 1818 4565898 2.185E7
12 88 211 20030907 1842 4565922 2.178E7
13 91 212 20030907 1918 4565958 2.166E7
14 93 212 20030907 1942 4565982 2.159E7
15 99 213 20030907 2042 4566042 2.138E7
16 102 213 20030907 2118 4566078 2.128E7
17 104 213 20030907 2142 4566102 2.121E7
18 108 214 20030907 2218 4566138 2.106E7
19 113 213 20030907 2318 4566198 2.093E7
Object is bright and comes out of the lower lefthand corner.
Thank you
Monte Collar |
Sep 08 2003 01:03:16 |
maik Meyer
xxx@xxx |
Monte,
this is Mercury. Remember, if something moves horizontally it
is almost every time a star or a planet. The transit list can
be accessed at http://ares.nrl.navy.mil/sungrazer/ or you may
simply use a planetarium software. By the way, more than 5 to
10 positions are not neccessary to post.
Maik
|
Sep 08 2003 02:43:33 |
Heiner Otterstedt
xxx@xxx |
Please disregard my post of Aug 29 2003 02:39:17
Mayby noise, mayby not, but anyway it is too dim.
Regards, Heiner |
Sep 08 2003 03:34:11 |
Kazimieras Cernis
xxx@xxx |
Possible non-group comet in C2 now.
0,0 in upper-left corner in 1024x1024 images.
Date Time X Y
2003/09/08 5:30 783 555
5:54 803 549
6:06 815 545
6:30 835 539
Kazimieras Cernis |
Sep 08 2003 03:42:51 |
Kazimieras Cernis
xxx@xxx |
Update. Comet is not faint and already is seen on 7 images.
Possible non-group comet in C2 now.
0,0 in upper-left corner in 1024x1024 images.
Date Time X Y
2003/09/08 5:06 762 562
5:30 783 555
5:54 803 549
6:06 815 545
6:30 835 539
6:54 855 533
Kazimieras Cernis |
Sep 08 2003 04:11:32 |
Maik Meyer
xxx@xxx |
Confirmation of Kazimieras' C2 non-group comet.
Maik |
Sep 08 2003 08:31:59 |
Rainer Kracht
xxx@xxx |
Congrats Kazimieras!
The apparent track (and velocity) in C2 is similar to the
tracks (and velocities) of the low inclination SOHO comets
C/1999 R1 and C/2002 R5.
Rainer
|
Sep 08 2003 08:58:42 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Knock off the talk on the form, use the
SOHOHUNTER yahoogroup for it!!
And post one find and ONE update no more
please!!
I'm trying to keep track of the finds
and the chatter and more than 1 update
messes things up...
Thanks
Mike B
|
Sep 08 2003 10:37:10 |
Rainer Kracht
xxx@xxx |
Kazimieras' C2 comet in now visible in C3
0,0 in upper-left corner in 1024x1024 images.
Date Time X Y
2003/09/08 09:18 602 529
09:42 606 527
10:20 613 525
10:42 616 524
12:18 632 519
If it follows the 1999 R1/2002 R5 tracks,
the track should first turn upwards and
then to the left, entering C2 again.
Rainer |
Sep 08 2003 17:09:33 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
Possible faint Kreutz comet
Positions: (0,0) upper left, 1024x1024
Date Time (x, y)
2003/09/08 C3 19:42 787 708
2003/09/08 C3 19:18 791 711
2003/09/08 C3 18:42 797 715
2003/09/08 C3 18:18 801 718
John |
Sep 08 2003 19:24:17 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
I can confirm John's claim of Sep 08 2003 17:09:33
--Tony Hoffman |
Sep 08 2003 20:02:19 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
Possible non-Kreutz comet in C2
(1024 x 1024 0,0 in upper left corner)
20030908_2306 960,275
20030908_2230 982,275
20030908_2206 1005,276
20030908_2154 1017,275
--Tony Hoffman
|
Sep 08 2003 20:09:50 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
Nothing at 23:30. It must have been noise;
I withdraw my report.
--Tony |
Sep 09 2003 00:24:40 |
Bo Zhou
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C2 at 2003/09/09 UT
1024x1024 gifs,
0,0 in upper left corner
Time X , Y
__:__ ___,___
0131 1017,811
0154
0206
------------
Bo Zhou |
Sep 09 2003 06:39:28 |
Pavel Shkreby
xxx@xxx |
Possible Kreutz comet in a real-time C3 images.
Visible from 2003/09/09 08:18 UT in 3 images.
Position in last images
Time X Y
08:18 - 721.774
08:42 - 720.769
09:18 - 718.763
1024x1024 0.0 - upper left corner
----------
Pavel |
Sep 09 2003 09:33:17 |
Usuki Ken-ichi
xxx@xxx |
Please teach me this object.
LASCO C3 images
0,0 in top-left corner of 1024 ~ 1024 images
col.row
20030909 08:18 725.475
20030909 08:42 725.475
20030909 09:18 725.474
20030909 09:42 725.474
20030909 10:19 724.473
20030909 10:42 724.473
Ken-ichi Usuki |
Sep 09 2003 13:58:44 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
Possible faint Kreutz
Positions: (0,0) upper left, 1024x1024
Date Time (x, y)
2003/09/09 C3 16:42 815 737
2003/09/09 C3 16:18 819 741
2003/09/09 C3 15:42 824 743
John |
Sep 09 2003 15:23:36 |
Rainer Kracht
xxx@xxx |
Another non-group comet in C2 images 1024*1024
0,0 in upper left corner
Quick look fts images
2003 Sep 07
file Time x y
21151108 0030 445 1010
21151109 0054 440 995
21151110 0132 431 970
21151111 0154 426 954
21151112 0206 424 945
21151113 0230 419 927
and (many?) more images
Rainer
|
Sep 09 2003 15:42:24 |
Maik Meyer
xxx@xxx |
Confirmation of Rainer's non-group comet. Quite bright.
Maik
|
Sep 09 2003 15:50:31 |
Rainer Kracht
xxx@xxx |
UPDATE another non-group comet in C2
GIF images 1024*1024
0,0 in upper left corner
Date Time x y
20030907 0030 578 13
20030907 0054 586 28
20030907 0132 592 53
20030907 0154 597 69
20030907 0206 599 78
20030907 0230 604 96
20030907 0330 615 146
20030907 0354 619 168
20030907 0406 621 180
20030907 0430 624 205
Rainer
|
Sep 09 2003 15:52:15 |
Maik Meyer
xxx@xxx |
Ken-ichi,
this is K. Cernis's non-group comet (see report of
Sep 08 2003 03:34:11 and follow-ups).
Maik
|
Sep 09 2003 16:24:32 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
Disregard my post of
Sep 09 2003 13:58:44.
It must have been Noise
John |
Sep 09 2003 16:41:30 |
Pavel Shkreby
xxx@xxx |
My post of Sep 09 2003 06:39:28 is mistake. Sorry for this post. |
Sep 10 2003 02:23:26 |
Bo Zhou
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C2 at 2003/09/07 UT
512x512 gifs,
0,0 in upper left corner
Time X , Y
__:__ __,___
0030 288, 5
0054 291, 13
0131 295, 25
0154 298, 33
0206 299, 38
0230 301, 47
------------
Bo Zhou |
Sep 10 2003 04:19:13 |
Bo Zhou
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C3 at 2003/09/10 UT
512x512 gifs,
0,0 in upper left corner
Time X , Y
__:__ __,___
0342 218,226
0318 223,191
0242 237,170
0218 247,161
0142 256,146
0042 265,132
0018
------------
Bo Zhou |
Sep 10 2003 05:11:30 |
Maik Meyer
xxx@xxx |
Bo,
please check previous reports before posting! Your first report is
Rainer's non-group comet (see posting of Sep 09 2003 15:23:36 and
Sep 09 2003 15:50:31).
The second report is just noise.
Maik
|
Sep 12 2003 16:26:55 |
Bo Zhou
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C2 at 2003/09/12 UT
1024x1024 gifs,
0,0 in upper left corner
Time X , Y
__:__ ___,___
1506 1019,750
1530 1011,741
1554 1004,735
1606 995,728
1630 985,717
------------
Bo Zhou |
Sep 12 2003 16:50:23 |
Bo Zhou
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C2 at 2003/09/12 UT
1024x1024 gifs,
0,0 in upper left corner
Time X , Y
__:__ ___,___
17:30 847,814
17:54 845,809
18:06 836,801
18:30 828,786
18:54
------------
Bo Zhou |
Sep 12 2003 17:13:38 |
Bo Zhou
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C2 at 2003/09/12 UT
1024x1024 gifs,
0,0 in upper left corner
Time X , Y
__:__ ___,___
0654 1015 757
0731 1006 739
0806 987 723
0830 943 677
0854
------------
Bo Zhou |
Sep 12 2003 20:59:12 |
XingMing Zhou
xxx@xxx |
Bo,
Oh,no,all reports aren't comets,just noise!
Please try to familiarize yourself with the data as much as
possible before submitting reports. And make sure you read the
common mistakes section of the "Found Something?" page.
XingMing
|
Sep 13 2003 23:46:53 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C3 @ 20030914_0018 UT
****** NOTE ******
x-coordinates are probably correct,
but y-coordinates may be off by 3-5
pixels. 777,460 in lower right corner
Corrections made for my 0,0
LASCO C3 IMAGES - 1024 x 1024
Date Time X Y
-------- ---- --- ---
2030914 0018 841 705
0042 840 703
0142 836 700
0218 835 699
--------------
Michael Boschat
|
Sep 14 2003 07:12:05 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Disregard my post below of:
Sep 13 2003 23:46:53
Further images and correspondence
decides it was noise mixed with
stars & other noise.
Mike B. |
Sep 15 2003 05:19:34 |
Frosty E Hardison
xxx@xxx |
Dim object heading out after 2003/09/08 flare. Contacted Dr. SOHO sent him animation capture. He suggested posting here.
2003/09/08 1918 X, Y at 512 by 512 with 0,0, upper left corner
2003/09/08 1918 344, 247
2003/09/08 1942 344, 249
2003/09/08 2042 348, 248
2003/09/08 2118 349, 247
2003/09/08 2142 351, 247
2003/09/08 2218 352, 246
2003/09/08 2318 354, 245
2003/09/08 2342 355, 244
2003/09/09 0018 356, 244
2003/09/09 0042 357, 243
2003/09/09 0142 358, 243
2003/09/09 0218 359, 241
2003/09/09 0242 360, 241
2003/09/09 0342 361, 241
Frosty
|
Sep 15 2003 05:31:57 |
Scarmato Toni
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in c3
Positions 812x562 0,0 top-left b/w images
with the pylon at the top right quadrant
20030915
0818 671,353
0842 670,351
0918 667,346
I am waiting other images to confirm
Regards,
Toni Scarmato |
Sep 15 2003 05:53:33 |
Scarmato Toni
xxx@xxx |
Nothing at 0942. Not consider my last report.
Toni Scarmato |
Sep 15 2003 06:00:43 |
Maik Meyer
xxx@xxx |
Frosty,
this is a non-group comet, discovered by K. Cernis already on
Sep 08 2003 03:34:11 in C2 and followed thereafter.
Maik
|
Sep 15 2003 18:43:45 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C3 @ 20030915_1842 UT
****** NOTE ******
x-coordinates are probably correct,
but y-coordinates may be off by
7 pixels. 777,460 in lower right corner
Corrections made for my 0,0
LASCO C3 IMAGES - 1024 x 1024
Date Time X Y
-------- ---- --- ---
20030915 1842 686 664
1918 684 662
1942 679 656
2042 676 654
2118 674 651
2142 669 648
--------------
Mike Boschat |
Sep 16 2003 11:56:20 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Disregard my post of Sep 15 2003 18:43:45
After further study and correspondence
with others we conclude that "noise"
was the result.
Mike Boschat |
Sep 17 2003 21:23:13 |
Joe Montani
xxx@xxx |
Fast moving object, brightening in time, until it is out of the
field of the wide-field camera, Lasco C3; no coma seen; no tail;
does not appear to be an "extended" object, but, interestingly,
like a point-source; very bright, but not saturated; motion is
westwards (retrograde). I measured the 1024 x 1024 images rather
roughly, using a cardboard straightedge which I calibrated in
pixels. I try to use your standard reporting format below. I
obtained rough RA and Dec of the object from the images, and
checked the MPC "MPC Checker" for know objects: object does not
appear to be known; I hope it may be new. I hope you will extract
the accurate astrometry and check the status of this object.
Pixel coordinate measurements, with (0,0) at the bottom left of the
screen, are given below for the object on four days between 2003 Sept. 11 and Sept 14.
Thank you!
--Joe Montani / Tucson, AZ
Lasco C3 bright moving object (comet?) suspect:
----------------------------------------------
0 600 265 20030911 1918
1 720 290 20030912 1818
2 850 300 20030913 1943
3 960 320 20030914 1842
|
Sep 17 2003 22:50:17 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
Joe--
What you've reported seems to be Mercury; it's displaced
about 15 arc-minutes from its position in Guide but otherwise
behaving as the planet would in motion and brightness; I think
the positional displacement is due to SOHO's halo orbit
1 million km from us, combined with the planet's position
at inferior conjunction. Interesting observation; I wasn't sure
what it was at first.
Regards,
--Tony |
Sep 18 2003 01:12:01 |
Joe Montani
xxx@xxx |
Negative, Tony; that's Mercury on the LEFT, badly saturated and sporting saturation tails (blooming) in the x-coordinate direction. See how it's (Mercury's) moving slowly in the increasing Ecliptic Longitude direction (approximately Eastwards), approaching a Stationary Point on Sept. 19 (2003).
The comet-suspect I noted is on the other side of the Sun in the images (right-hand), and moving in the opposite direction from Mercury, and, moreover, is not saturated (by a long shot), but it becomes steadily brighter between Sept. 11-14 (2003), and becomes about as bright as the brightest field-stars imaged on those days.
Granted, although Mercury (on the Left...) is only some 8 degrees elongation from the Sun, that is elongation enough for Mercury to display sufficient sunlit surface toward us (and Lasco C3) to constitute a lot of reflected light (and enough to more than saturate, evidently).
Please have another look, try to identify Mercury, (at about "9:30" position from the Sun), and then find the fainter fast-mover I found, running, on the earliest date I noted, from about "6:00", to the edge of the field (and over...) at about "3:30", on the latest date.
Let's see what the fellers at the SOHO office say on Thursday, daytime (there).
Maybe my suspect is a small natural near L1, where SOHO is, but slightly nearer the Sun? An orbital period just slightly different from SOHO's could carry it across the field of view in a few days, as we see has happened. Far as I know, no such (natural) objects have been discovered (nor at L4, nor L5, although ground-based searches have been made: of course, ground-based searches at L1 cannot be made, except during total Solar eclipses!, and, then, for just a few minutes, at most; this suspect's inclination, by the way, appears to be non-zero, and slightly positive).
But I'll be happy if the object is a comet.
Cheers!
--Joe Montani / Tucson |
Sep 18 2003 01:14:22 |
Joe Montani
xxx@xxx |
Negative, Tony; that's Mercury on the LEFT, badly saturated and
sporting saturation tails (blooming) in the x-coordinate
direction. See how it's (Mercury's) moving slowly in the
increasing Ecliptic Longitude direction (approximately Eastwards),
approaching a Stationary Point on Sept. 19 (2003).
The comet-suspect I noted is on the other side of the Sun in the
images (right-hand), and moving in the opposite direction from
Mercury, and, moreover, is not saturated (by a long shot), but it
becomes steadily brighter between Sept. 11-14 (2003), and becomes
about as bright as the brightest field-stars imaged on those days.
Granted, although Mercury (on the Left...) is only some 8 degrees
elongation from the Sun, that is elongation enough for Mercury to
display sufficient sunlit surface toward us (and Lasco C3) to
constitute a lot of reflected light (and enough to more than
saturate, evidently).
Please have another look, try to identify Mercury, (at about "9:30"
position from the Sun), and then find the fainter fast-mover I
found, running, on the earliest date I noted, from about "6:00",
to the edge of the field (and over...) at about "3:30", on the
latest date.
Let's see what the fellers at the SOHO office say on Thursday,
daytime (there).
Maybe my suspect is a small natural near L1, where SOHO is, but
slightly nearer the Sun? An orbital period just slightly
different from SOHO's could carry it across the field of view in
a few days, as we see has happened. Far as I know, no such
(natural) objects have been discovered (nor at L4, nor L5,
although ground-based searches have been made: of course,
ground-based searches at L1 cannot be made, except during total
Solar eclipses!, and, then, for just a few minutes, at most; this
suspect's inclination, by the way, appears to be non-zero, and
slightly positive).
But I'll be happy if the object is a comet.
Cheers!
--Joe Montani / Tucson
|
Sep 18 2003 02:10:41 |
scott virtes
xxx@xxx |
There seems to be some confusion here. The C3 transits page says there's a two month long "Right to Left" transit of Venus just ending -- so the "big saturated image at 9:30 position" is Venus. The fainter "left-to-right" transit from Sep 7-15, the object reported by Joe, is Mercury. Both were fairly obvious on the MPG of the week, and I made sure to check them both out before "reporting" them.
- scott |
Sep 18 2003 02:16:28 |
Nicholas Previsich
xxx@xxx |
Re the object in the last post: Does anyone have access to a good asteroid almanac? I noticed this object yesterday and tenatively assumed that it was one of the big ones (Ceres, Pallas, Juno or Vesta; think that the last two aren't near the Sun right now, though).
All that notwithstanding, I sincerely hope that it really IS something new and strange!:) Good luck. |
Sep 18 2003 03:48:08 |
Sebastian Hönig
xxx@xxx |
Hello guys,
just saw your dicussion on the "comet" reported by Joe. Since I am
the creater of the C3 planet transit list this year let be warn you:
SOHO is rolled for a few months now but images remain as they were,
so all directions in the list are wrong. "Left to right" means
"right to left now, and vice versa.
Questions on the list may be directed to me or discussed on the
sohohunter yahoogroup.
Regards,
Sebastian |
Sep 18 2003 07:11:00 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
THESE objects have just LEFT the field.
VENUS --- at the 9 pm position
MERCURY - near the 5 pm position
And that is the fact of it all. No comet
but 2 planets.
Mike Boschat |
Sep 18 2003 08:05:17 |
Xavier Leprette
xxx@xxx |
Object suspect in a real-time C3 images now.
It is visible in 3 consecutive images of 2003/09/18
0,0 in top-left corner of 1024x1024 images
col, row
08:42 792,726
09:42 782,719
10:20 774,714
10:42
Xavier Leprette |
Sep 18 2003 08:14:43 |
Xavier Leprette
xxx@xxx |
Object suspect in a real-time C3 images now.
UPDATE :
It is visible in 5 consecutive images of 2003/09/18
0,0 in top-left corner of 1024x1024 images
col, row
08:42 792,726
09:42 782,719
10:20 774,714
10:42 770,711
11:18 764,706 (B&W image enlarged in 1024 pix)
Xavier Leprette |
Sep 18 2003 08:59:11 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
I can confirm Xavier Leprette
comet in C3 of Sep 18 2003 08:14:43
congrats
Mike Boschat |
Sep 18 2003 09:01:04 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
I should have
said CONFIRMED Xavier's comet find in C3 at
Sep 18 2003 08:05:17 -- his first post!
Mike Boschat |
Sep 18 2003 13:15:23 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet farther in front of
Xavier's find in C3 @ 20030918_1342 UT
****** NOTE ******
x-coordinates are probably correct,
but y-coordinates may be off by 3-5
pixels. 777,460 in lower right corner
Corrections made for my 0,0
LASCO C3 IMAGES - 1024 x 1024
Date Time X Y
-------- ---- --- ---
20030918 1342 713 671
1418 706 666
1442 699 663
1518 694 659
1542 687 654
---------------
Mike Boschat
|
Sep 18 2003 13:44:57 |
Joe Montani
xxx@xxx |
Eating significant amounts of un-seasoned Crow today... .
"Beginner's Luck", I suppose, in having two inner-planets in the C3
field. What I believed to be "Mercury" is in fact Venus, and my
comet- or asteroid-suspect is in fact Mercury.
Thanks to all of you for your help. False alarm. I' m sorry I
transmitted before checking ALL the reasonable possibilities.
Good hunting,
--Joe / Tucson |
Sep 19 2003 14:57:40 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
UPDTAE on comet in front of
Xavier's find in C3 @ 20030918_1342 UT
****** NOTE ******
x-coordinates are probably correct,
but y-coordinates may be off by 3-5
pixels. 777,460 in lower right corner
Corrections made for my 0,0
LASCO C3 IMAGES - 1024 x 1024
Date Time X Y
-------- ---- --- ---
20030918 1342 713 671
1418 706 666
1442 699 663
1518 694 659
1542 687 654
1618 679 648
1718 666 640
1742 661 634
1818 654 629
1842 647 625
---------------
Mike Boschat |
Sep 19 2003 15:02:08 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
I can confirm Mike Boschat's
faint Kreutz of Sep 18 2003 13:15:23.
John |
Sep 19 2003 19:51:47 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Is this Xavier's comet in C2 @ 20030918_2030 UT
or new one?
****** NOTE ******
x-coordinates are probably correct,
but y-coordinates may be off by 3-5
pixels. 777,460 in lower right corner
Corrections made for my 0,0
LASCO C2 IMAGES - 1024 x 1024
Date Time X Y
-------- ---- --- ---
20030918 2030 1006 821
2345 976 801
20030919 0006 962 789
0030 932 768
---------------
Mike Boschat
|
Sep 19 2003 20:59:25 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
Possible faint comet in C3 on Kreutz track
(1024 x 1024, 0,0 in upper left corner)
20030919_2018 674,634
20030919_1942 678,637
20030919_1842 684,645
20030919_1818 688,648
20030919_1742 692,653
--Tony Hoffman
|
Sep 22 2003 10:49:23 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
I withdraw my report of Sep 19 2003 20:59:25.
If there's anything there, it's too marginal
to be of any use.
--Tony |
Sep 22 2003 11:13:02 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
Update on Kreutz Comet I reported via
Yahoo Groups Site
This comet is visible starting in frame
10:42 till 18:42 on the 2003/09/21 images
Positions: (0,0) upper left, 1024x1024
Date Time (x, y)
2003/09/21 C3 16:42 643 630
2003/09/21 C3 16:18 647 634
2003/09/21 C3 15:42 656 640
2003/09/21 C3 15:18 661 644
2003/09/21 C3 14:42 669 650
2003/09/21 C3 14:18 675 653
2003/09/21 C3 13:42 681 659
2003/09/21 C3 12:42 694 668
2003/09/21 C3 11:18 711 680
John Sachs |
Sep 22 2003 11:18:49 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
The post below of Sep 22 2003 11:13:02
should have read :
This comet is visible starting in frame
01:42 till 18:42 on the 2003/09/21 images.
John
|
Sep 25 2003 14:53:47 |
John Sachs
xxx@xxx |
Possible Kreutz Comet
Positions: (0,0) upper left, 1024x1024
Date Time (x, y)
2003/09/25 C3 18:18 781 746
2003/09/25 C3 17:42 787 751
2003/09/25 C3 17:18 791 753
2003/09/25 C3 16:42 797 757
2003/09/25 C3 16:18 802 762
John Sachs |
Sep 25 2003 14:59:24 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Can CONFIRM John Sachs Kruetz
comet of today at Sep 25 2003 14:53:47
Mike Boschat |
Sep 26 2003 08:01:06 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
object in C3 @ 20030926_0241 UT
****** NOTE ******
x-coordinates are probably correct,
but y-coordinates may be off by 13 to 5
pixels. 777,460 in lower right corner
Corrections made for my 0,0
LASCO C3 IMAGES - 1024 x 1024
Date Time X Y
-------- ---- --- ---
20030926 0241 683 642
0405 677 640
0415 666 631
--------------
Mike Boschat
|
Sep 26 2003 10:29:00 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
DISREGARD my post of today
Sep 26 2003 08:01:06
noise I guess..
Mike Boschat |
Sep 26 2003 22:03:00 |
mike boschat
xxx@xxx |
Possible comet in C3 @ 20030927_0025 UT
****** NOTE ******
x-coordinates are probably correct,
but y-coordinates may be off by 13 to 5
pixels. 777,460 in lower right corner
Corrections made for my 0,0
LASCO C3 IMAGES - 1024 x 1024
Date Time X Y
-------- ---- --- ---
20030927 0025 695 674
0035 691 670
0045 688 668
0055 682 666
0105 678 662 (?) in star
--------------
Mike Boschat
|
Sep 29 2003 09:44:52 |
Rainer Kracht
xxx@xxx |
non-group comet in C2 GIF images 1024x1024
2003 September 25
(0,0) in upper left corner
Time x y
200309250030 1019 188
200309250054 988 196
200309250132 938 211
200309250154 907 221
200309250206 890 226
200309250230 856 237
200309250254 820 249
200309250306 801 255
200309250330 765 268
This is the comet I have reported
to the Yahoo sohohunter list Sep 27.
Rainer
|
Sep 29 2003 22:06:53 |
Tony Hoffman
xxx@xxx |
For the record, I will confirm Rainer's
non-group comet here.
--Tony |